Changan CS35 2020 1.6L Standard (2WD) vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 59060
SAR 57134
SAR 56799
SAR 54970
SAR 795
SAR 769
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
SUV/
12.8
Engine / Motor
180
170
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4160
4323
1810
1809
1670
1653
2560
2585
348
359/1166
/
1318
/
17
/
5
/
145
Fuel Economy
14.7
17.2
52
45
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10.1
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
123 BHP
118 BHP
160
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
