Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Price Comparison
SAR 116053
SAR 140937
SAR 111665
SAR 135585
SAR 1562
SAR 1897
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4949
4550
1930
1820
1790
1680
2810
2620
/
1053
Fuel Economy
10.5
11.0
74
58
Comfort
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
Interior
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✔
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233 BHP
188 BHP
360
222
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
