Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 116053
TBD
SAR 111665
TBD
SAR 1562
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
4
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
4949
5115
1930
1980
1790
1920
2810
/
Fuel Economy
10.5
9.3
74
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
✔
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
Exterior
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
233 BHP
304 BHP
360
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔