Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Platinum (7-Seater) AWD vs Haval H9 2025 Mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Spacious and comfortable interior space
- Powerful engine performance in various conditions
Negative
- Average fuel economy
- Interior design needs to be improved
- Noise control is lower than expected
Price Comparison
SAR 125633
TBD
SAR 120865
TBD
SAR 1691
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.4
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 100.8
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 110.88
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 403.2
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 443.52
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5256
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5781.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
4
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
4949
5070
1930
1976
1790
1930
2810
2850
/
18
/
1635
/
1635
/
2890
/
/
Fuel Economy
10.2
9.1
74
90
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Transmission
✓
✓
Automatic
Automatic
/
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
✓
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233 BHP
214 BHP
360
380
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
