Ciciv SPORT vs City DX 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
SAR 105940
SAR 72068
SAR 101898
SAR 69339
SAR 1426
SAR 970
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4689
4553 mm
1801
1748 mm
1415
1476 mm
,735
2650 mm
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
47
40 L
/
13 Km/L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
√
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
119 BHP
112
/
6400
/
181
145 Nm
5000
/
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
