Ciciv SPORT vs Toyota Camry 2024 2.5L LE (204 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
SAR 105940
SAR 107580
SAR 101898
SAR 103500
SAR 1426
SAR 1448
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
195
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4689
4885
1801
1840
1415
1445
,735
2824
/
493
Fuel Economy
47
60
/
14.9
Comfort
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
√
✓
✓
/
√
✓
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
204 BHP
112
/
6400
/
181
243
5000
/
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
