Ciciv SPORT vs Honda Accord 2023 1.5T EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- Smooth and safe driving experience
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Screen technologies and user interface need to be improved
- Traditional exterior design lacks innovation
- Off-road performance affects comfort
Price Comparison
SAR 105940
SAR 146887
SAR 101898
SAR 141335
SAR 1426
SAR 1977
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
195
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4689
4890
1801
1860
1415
1450
,735
2830
/
473
Fuel Economy
47
56
/
18.5
Comfort
√
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
✓
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
198 BHP
112
/
6400
/
181
260
5000
/
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
√
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
