Ciciv SPORT vs S 560 -copy Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 105940
TBD
SAR 101898
TBD
SAR 1426
TBD
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
/
Dimensions
5
/
4689
/
1801
/
1415
/
,735
/
Fuel Economy
47
/
Comfort
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
√
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
/
Gasoline
/
150
/
112
/
6400
/
181
/
5000
/
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
