City 1.5L DX 2025 vs 6 Pure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Price Comparison
SAR 72068
SAR 90634
SAR 69339
SAR 87167
SAR 970
SAR 1220
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
4
4
1490 cc
2488 cc
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4553 mm
4870 mm
1748 mm
1840 mm
1476 mm
1450 mm
2650 mm
2830 mm
/
419 L
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
15 Km/L
40 L
62 L
13 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
Single Turbo
4
4
119 BHP
185 BHP
145 Nm
250 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
