City 1.5L DX 2025 vs K8 2.5L GDI Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- Modern and luxurious interior design
- Optimal performance and economical fuel consumption
- Security system and advanced technologies
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Slightly limited rear legroom
- Difficulty in the availability of some custom options
Price Comparison
SAR 72068
TBD
SAR 69339
TBD
SAR 970
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
5015 mm
1748 mm
1875 mm
1476 mm
1455 mm
2650 mm
2895 mm
/
510 L
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
12 Km/L
40 L
64 L
13 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
198 BHP
145 Nm
248 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
