City 1.5L DX 2025 vs Volkswagen Passat 2023 2.5L Trendline Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 72068
TBD
SAR 69339
TBD
SAR 970
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
190
4
4
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
4910
1748 mm
1835
1476 mm
1472
2650 mm
2803
/
450
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
10.6
40 L
70
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
170 BHP
145 Nm
200
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
