Civic Type R 2025 2.0T vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 204390
TBD
SAR 196650
TBD
SAR 2751
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4
/
4594
5115
1890
1980
1407
1920
2735
/
/
/
Fuel Economy
13.4
9.3
47
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
12
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
265/30 R19
/
265/30 R19
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
315 BHP
304 BHP
420
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
