Coolray 2025 GL vs T77 Limousine Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 80601
SAR 101340
SAR 77501
SAR 97498
SAR 1085
SAR 1364
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200
4
/
1477 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
/
4 Doors
5
4380 mm
4525
1810 mm
1845
1615 mm
1615
2600 mm
2700
330 L
560
180 mm
/
/
1515
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
15.5
45 L
45
16 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
225/45 R19
/
225/45 R19
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 T
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172 BHP
168 BHP
290 Nm
258
/
142/5500
/
1500/4350
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
