Coolray 2025 GL vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 80601
TBD
SAR 77501
TBD
SAR 1085
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1477 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
17
4 Doors
5
4380 mm
4318
1810 mm
1831
1615 mm
1662
2600 mm
2610
330 L
/
180 mm
/
/
Flush Door
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
/
45 L
/
16 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
/
Leather
Cloth
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Dual Front Airbags
Infotainment
12.3
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
4
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172 BHP
111 BHP
290 Nm
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
ECO, Normal
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
