CarteaCompare CarsCS35 Plus Trend vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

CS35 Plus Trend vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and striking exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Reliable and consistent performance

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • The infotainment system is outdated
  • Limited engine choices

Price Comparison

SAR 70570

SAR 84918

SAR 67850

SAR 81688

SAR 950

SAR 1143

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.06 L/KM

0.08 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 6.99

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 9.32

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 48.93

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 65.24

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 209.7

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 279.6

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 2551.35

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 3401.8

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

193 km/h

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

17

/

4

/

4335

4355 mm

1825

1810 mm

1660

1625 mm

2600

2670 mm

/

358 L

Fuel Economy

17.3

12.5 Km/L

53

63 L

/

12.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Mocha Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Dual Airbag (Driver & Passenger)

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.25 Inch

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

Transmission

DCT

/

7

/

DCT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Electric

/

Wheels/brakes

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.4 T

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

158 BHP

150 BHP

260

197 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

Sport

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | CS35 Plus Trend

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2024 1.5L Luxury

Changan | CS35 Plus Trend

VS

Hyundai | Creta 1.5 GL 6MT

Changan | CS35 Plus Trend

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Luxury

Changan | CS35 Plus Trend

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2021 1.6L (115HP) Active+

Changan | CS35 Plus Trend

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2022 1.6 SL

Changan Related Car

Mitsubishi Related Car