CS35 Plus Trend vs X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 70570
SAR 105129
SAR 67850
SAR 101144
SAR 950
SAR 1415
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
220 km/h
/
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
17
/
4
5 Doors
4330
4749 mm
1825
1900 mm
1660
1720 mm
2600
2745 mm
/
480 L
/
210 mm
Fuel Economy
17.3
13 Km/L
53
57 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Mocha Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Dual Airbag (Driver & Passenger)
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25 Inch
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
6
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DCT
/
7
/
DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Electric
/
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
158 BHP
197 BHP
260
290 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
