Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs Changan CS95 2020 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 115680
SAR 119538
SAR 111299
SAR 114989
SAR 1557
SAR 1609
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
185
4
4
1590 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4590 mm
4949
1900 mm
1930
1685 mm
1790
2720 mm
2810
160 mm
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
10.5
57 L
74
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
194 BHP
233 BHP
290 Nm
360
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
