Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs GMC Acadia 2023 3.6L AT4 (AWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 115680
TBD
SAR 111299
TBD
SAR 1557
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
6
1590 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4590 mm
4917
1900 mm
1915
1685 mm
1676
2720 mm
2858
160 mm
/
/
362
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
11.4
57 L
72
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
194 BHP
310 BHP
290 Nm
366
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
