Dodge Charger 2024 3.6L GT vs 6 Pure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 90634
TBD
SAR 87167
TBD
SAR 1220
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
210 km/h
6
4
/
2488 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5040
4870 mm
1905
1840 mm
1479
1450 mm
3052
2830 mm
455
419 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.3
15 Km/L
70
62 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
300 BHP
185 BHP
358
250 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
