E300 3.0L vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 462649
SAR 217026
SAR 445141
SAR 208826
SAR 6227
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
210
4
6
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4949 mm
5040
1880 mm
1905
1480 mm
1479
2961 mm
3052
540 L
455
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
9.3
66 L
70
9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
300 BHP
420 Nm
358
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
