Eado Plus Smart vs City LX 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
SAR 75187
SAR 77409
SAR 72335
SAR 74445
SAR 1012
SAR 1042
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
1494 mL
1490 cc
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
4770
4553 mm
1840
1788 mm
1440
1467 mm
2765
2650 mm
/
4 Doors
/
506 L
Fuel Economy
18.4
13 Km/L
51
40 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
Segment TFT 10.25 Inches
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Airbag (Driver & Passenger), Front Row Side Airbags, Front Row Curtain Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2 Inches
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
DCT
/
7
/
7-DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson Independent
/
Twist-beam Non-independent
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
225/45 R18
/
225/45 R18
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
4
4
DOHC
/
178 BHP
119 BHP
300
145 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
Motor
181
/
Transverse
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco - Normal - Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
