Emgrand 2026 GS vs Suzuki Ciaz 2024 1.5L GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Price Comparison
SAR 61512
SAR 62180
SAR 59160
SAR 59800
SAR 828
SAR 837
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
165
4
4
1496 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
16
/
4 Doors
/
4638 mm
4490
1822 mm
1730
1460 mm
1475
2650 mm
2650
500 L
495
151 mm
/
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
16.7
50 L
43
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
2
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
121
103 BHP
152 Nm
138
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
