ES 300h vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 205723
SAR 217026
SAR 197915
SAR 208826
SAR 2769
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210
4
6
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4975 mm
5040
1865 mm
1905
1445 mm
1479
2870 mm
3052
/
455
/
/
Fuel Economy
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
10
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
E-CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
3.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
214 BHP
300 BHP
356 Nm
358
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
