ES 300h vs K8 2.5L GDI Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Positive
- Modern and luxurious interior design
- Optimal performance and economical fuel consumption
- Security system and advanced technologies
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Slightly limited rear legroom
- Difficulty in the availability of some custom options
Price Comparison
SAR 205723
TBD
SAR 197915
TBD
SAR 2769
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4975 mm
5015 mm
1865 mm
1875 mm
1445 mm
1455 mm
2870 mm
2895 mm
/
510 L
/
/
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
12 Km/L
50 L
64 L
15 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
10
/
Transmission
E-CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
2.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
214 BHP
198 BHP
356 Nm
248 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
