ET5 Standard Range vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern exterior and interior design
- Advanced high-tech and intelligent systems
- Comfortable and stable driving experience
Negative
- High pricing and value-for-money concerns
- Limited charging network and infrastructure
- Insufficient aftersales service and maintenance support
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 212196
SAR 217026
SAR 204177
SAR 208826
SAR 2856
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210
/
6
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4790
5040
1960
1905
1499
1479
2888 mm
3052
options. L
455
options. mm
/
Fuel Economy
/
9.3
/
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
3.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
320 BHP
300 BHP
550 Nm
358
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
