EV9 GT vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 243700
SAR 149327
SAR 234498
SAR 143635
SAR 3280
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5010
4760 mm
1980
1930 mm
1755
1927 mm
3100
2750 mm
90
400 L
52
/
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
380
224 BHP
283
/
700
387 Nm
4000
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
