Expedition 2025 AWD vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 89220
TBD
SAR 85799
TBD
SAR 1201
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.12 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.98
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 97.86
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 419.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5102.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
190
6
4
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
5636
4571
2029
1855
1941
1719
3343
2708
592
430
Fuel Economy
8.1
14.7
107
55
Comfort
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
Transmission
✓
✔
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
Exterior
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
Engine
3.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
440 BHP
171 BHP
691
275
Technologies
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔