Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
SAR 151117
SAR 89220
SAR 145385
SAR 85799
SAR 2034
SAR 1201
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4432
4571
1883
1855
1560
1719
2700
2708
/
430
Fuel Economy
/
14.7
/
55
Comfort
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
Transmission
✓
✔
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
Exterior
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
0.0 L
1.5 L
Electric
Gasoline
200 BHP
171 BHP
310
275
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
