Groove 1.5L LT vs MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Good and convenient internal space distribution
Negative
- The engine performance is mediocre, especially when accelerating
- The quality of interior details needs improvement
- Insufficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 74889
SAR 77710
SAR 72044
SAR 74750
SAR 1008
SAR 1046
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
170
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4500 mm
4314
/
1809
/
1624
/
2585
/
448
Fuel Economy
16.1 Km/L
17.2
16.1 Km/L
/
/
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
112 BHP
147 Nm
150
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
