CarteaCompare CarsGroove 1.5L LT vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid

Groove 1.5L LT vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel efficiency
  • Good and convenient internal space distribution

Negative

  • The engine performance is mediocre, especially when accelerating
  • The quality of interior details needs improvement
  • Insufficient sound insulation on highways

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Price Comparison

SAR 74889

TBD

SAR 72044

TBD

SAR 1008

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.06 L/KM

0.13 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 6.99

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 15.15

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 48.93

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 106.02

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 216.69

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 469.5

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 2551.35

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 5527.93

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

/

12.5

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

180

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4500 mm

4385

/

1875

/

1850

/

2560

/

500

Fuel Economy

16.1 Km/L

7.7

16.1 Km/L

/

/

69

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

110 BHP

184 BHP

147 Nm

303

Technologies

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

MG | MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Venue 2023 1.6L SE

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Toyota | Raize Limited

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen T-Roc 2021 1.4L TSI Trend

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Rush 2023 1.5L STD (7-Seater)

Chevrolet Related Car

Mitsubishi Related Car

Chevrolet Related New Car