Groove 1.5L LT vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Good and convenient internal space distribution
Negative
- The engine performance is mediocre, especially when accelerating
- The quality of interior details needs improvement
- Insufficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 74889
TBD
SAR 72044
TBD
SAR 1008
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 469.5
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
16
/
4500 mm
4385
/
1875
/
1850
/
2560
/
500
Fuel Economy
16.1 Km/L
7.7
45
69
16.1 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✔
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 T
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
145hp
184 BHP
255Nm
303
Technologies
✔
/
✔
/
/
✓
