GT 1.5T COM vs City LX 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive sporty design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited background space
- Less acceleration compared to some competitors
- Limited engine options
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
SAR 73546
SAR 77409
SAR 70730
SAR 74445
SAR 990
SAR 1042
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1539
/
18
/
4 Doors
4 Doors
4571
4553 mm
1855
1788 mm
1719
1467 mm
2708
2650 mm
430
506 L
145
/
Fuel Economy
16.9 Km/L
13 Km/L
55
40 L
16.9 Km/L
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
171
119 BHP
275
145 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
