H6 Active vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern interior and exterior design
- High fuel efficiency;
- Advanced security technologies
Negative
- Mediocre engine performance at high speeds
- The comfort of the seats is not optimal for long distances
- Availability of spare parts may be limited in some areas
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 95320
TBD
SAR 91698
TBD
SAR 1283
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
5
5
/
Flush Door
/
17
/
5
/
4318
/
1831
/
1662
/
2610
Fuel Economy
14.9 km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
Yes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
10.25 Inch
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
4
Dual Front Airbags
No
/
es
/
Yes
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
/
Yes
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
8 + DTS
4
/
10.25
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/60 R18
215/60 R17
225/60 R18
215/60 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Turbocharged
1.5L
4
/
DOHC
/
201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm
111 BHP
105
/
320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm
/
Technologies
Yes
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Yes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
