H6 Active vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern interior and exterior design
- High fuel efficiency;
- Advanced security technologies
Negative
- Mediocre engine performance at high speeds
- The comfort of the seats is not optimal for long distances
- Availability of spare parts may be limited in some areas
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 93460
TBD
SAR 89900
TBD
SAR 1258
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
/
5115
/
1980
/
1920
Fuel Economy
14.9 km/L
9.3
/
110
Comfort
✓
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25 Inch
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
4
/
No
/
es
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
/
Yes
/
Yes
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
8 + DTS
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
225/60 R18
/
225/60 R18
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Turbocharge
/
Turbocharged
/
4
/
DOHC
/
201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm
304 BHP
105
/
320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm
700
Technologies
Yes
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
