H9 Mid vs Sportage Smartstream 2.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Spacious and comfortable interior space
- Powerful engine performance in various conditions
Negative
- Average fuel economy
- Interior design needs to be improved
- Noise control is lower than expected
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 132240
SAR 102970
SAR 127200
SAR 99046
SAR 1780
SAR 1386
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
220 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4950 mm
4515 mm
1930 mm
865 mm
1960 mm
1650 mm
2800 mm
2680 mm
750 L
591 L
/
4 Doors
/
/
Fuel Economy
/
12 Km/L
90 L
54 L
9.1 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Safety
6
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.6
8
8
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
214
152 BHP
380 Nm
192 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
