H9 Mid vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Spacious and comfortable interior space
- Powerful engine performance in various conditions
Negative
- Average fuel economy
- Interior design needs to be improved
- Noise control is lower than expected
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 132240
TBD
SAR 127200
TBD
SAR 1780
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
/
6
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
4950 mm
5115
1930 mm
1980
1960 mm
1920
2800 mm
/
750 L
/
Fuel Economy
/
9.3
90 L
110
9.1 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6
/
Front and Rear
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.6
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
214
304 BHP
380 Nm
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
