H9 Mid vs TXL Comfort 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Spacious and comfortable interior space
- Powerful engine performance in various conditions
Negative
- Average fuel economy
- Interior design needs to be improved
- Noise control is lower than expected
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 132240
TBD
SAR 127200
TBD
SAR 1780
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4950 mm
4780 mm
1930 mm
1885 mm
1960 mm
1730 mm
2800 mm
2800 mm
750 L
450 L
/
5 Doors
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
/
16 Km/L
90 L
50 L
9.1 Km/L
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
6
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.6
12.3
8
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
214
290 BHP
380 Nm
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
