Honda CR-V 2024 DX (2WD) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 150517
TBD
SAR 144785
TBD
SAR 2026
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
/
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4586
5115
1855
1980
1678
1920
2660
/
Fuel Economy
15.6
9.3
57
110
Comfort
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
✔
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✔
Wheels/brakes
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Exterior
✔
✔
✔
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
2.4 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
184 BHP
304 BHP
244
700
Technologies
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
