H9 Luxury vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 266060
SAR 217026
SAR 256000
SAR 208826
SAR 3581
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210
/
6
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
20 Wheel Rims 245/40 R20
/
4
/
5137
5040
1905
1905
1493
1479
3060
3052
370 | 13.07 cu. ft
455
Fuel Economy
2.0T engine averaging around 8.0 liters per 100 kilometers
9.3
/
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT Shift by Wire
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Double wishbone independent front suspension with strut
/
Trapezoidal arm-type multi-link suspension with strut
/
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0T Turbocharged Direct Injection
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0T Turbocharged Direct Injection
/
250
300 BHP
185
/
380
358
Motor
185
/
250
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✔️
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
