HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 105056
SAR 149327
SAR 101079
SAR 143635
SAR 1414
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200 km/h
4
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4630
4760 mm
1890
1930 mm
1663
1927 mm
2750
2750 mm
507
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
13.5
10 Km/L
65
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
9AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
231
224 BHP
370
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
