HS 2.0T Comfort vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 83945
TBD
SAR 80722
TBD
SAR 1130
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4574 mm
5115
1876 mm
1980
1685 mm
1920
2720 mm
/
463 L
/
Fuel Economy
12.2 Km/L
9.3
55 L
110
12.2 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✔
Wheels/brakes
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
231 BHP
304 BHP
360 Nm
700
Technologies
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
