Hyundai Kona 2023 2.0L Comfort 2 Tone vs Territory Titanium Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and stylish design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Poor off road performance
- Light noise inside the cabin at high speeds
Positive
- Cohesive and stylish exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Balanced engine and steering performance
Negative
- Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
- Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
- Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration
Price Comparison
SAR 99627
SAR 135891
SAR 95835
SAR 130755
SAR 1341
SAR 1829
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
194
200 km/h
4
4
/
1798 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4165
4630 mm
1801
1935 mm
1565
1706 mm
2600
2726 mm
544
385 L
/
5 Doors
/
190 mm
Fuel Economy
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
All Liquid Cluster
/
Leather Trim
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
190 BHP
180
320
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
