L6 2025 Pro vs Nissan Pathfinder 2023 3.5L S 2WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Price Comparison
SAR 197778
SAR 172660
SAR 190288
SAR 166099
SAR 2662
SAR 2324
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
190
4
6
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
7 Seater
2330
/
20
/
5
/
4925
5046
1960
1975
1735
1795
2920
2900
1696
/
1704
/
180 mm
/
/
470
Fuel Economy
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Electric
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
4.82
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
OLED
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Nappa Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.7
/
15.7
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
19
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
1
/
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Double wishbone front suspension
/
Five-link rear suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
255/50 R20
/
255/50 R20
/
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
408 BHP
271 BHP
330
/
620
340
Motor
529
/
2
/
3.5 kW
/
PMSM
/
300
/
408
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Comfort, Normal, Sport, Performance
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
L2
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
