Land Cruiser GX DSL vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
SAR 262714
SAR 88118
SAR 252770
SAR 84790
SAR 3536
SAR 1186
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.12
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 214.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 302.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2613.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
7
5
18
18
4950
4571 mm
1980
1855 mm
1905
1719 mm
/
2708 mm
/
430 L
/
145
Fuel Economy
12.6
14.7 Km/L
110
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Front Doors
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Front + Knee
2
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
14.1
✓
✓
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Front + Central + Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
225/50 R18
265/65 R18
225/50 R18
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.3
1.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
302
171 BHP
700
275 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
