Land Cruiser GXR1 vs Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Price Comparison
SAR 267617
SAR 140937
SAR 257485
SAR 135585
SAR 3602
SAR 1897
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
/
200
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5115
4550
1980
1820
1905
1680
/
2620
/
1053
Fuel Economy
10.1
11.0
110
58
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Doors
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Hi Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Central And Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
409
188 BHP
650
222
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
