Land Cruiser GXR1 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2023 2.0T SE (250 PS) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 267617
TBD
SAR 257485
TBD
SAR 3602
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
230
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5115
4395
1980
1984
1905
1649
/
2681
/
577
Fuel Economy
10.1
13.0
110
68.5
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Front Doors
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Hi Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Central And Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
409
245 BHP
650
365
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
