Land Cruiser GR-S HEV vs Porsche Macan 2019 Turbo S Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Exceptional driving experience with high precision
- Luxurious interior design with high-quality materials
- The attractiveness of the Porsche brand
Negative
- Limited interior space for seats and trunk
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Low suitability for everyday practical use
Price Comparison
SAR 445564
SAR 437020
SAR 428720
SAR 420500
SAR 5997
SAR 5882
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.96
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 90.72
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 100.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 362.88
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 403.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4730.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5256
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
6
6
/
270
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5115
4684
1990
1926
1945
1624
/
2807
/
488
Fuel Economy
10.9
10.2
68
75
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
All Doors
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
12.3
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
✓
Driver Seat
/
Premium Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Four
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
Front + Knee + Side (1st & 2nd Row) + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Front + Central + Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5
3.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
457 BHP
440 BHP
790
550
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
