Land Cruiser Hybrid VXR vs X5 M50i xDrive Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Price Comparison
SAR 414057
SAR 453740
SAR 398385
SAR 436600
SAR 5573
SAR 6107
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
3498
/
GCC
/
/
250 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5005
4922 mm
1980
2004 mm
1940
1745 mm
/
2975 mm
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
10.9
9.5 Km/L
98
83 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front, Rear And Third Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
11
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
/
JBL
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/55 R20
/
265/55 R20
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
4.4 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
457 BHP
530 BHP
790
750 Nm
24 V, DUAL VVT-I, V35A-FTS
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
