Lynk & Co 09 2024 2.0T Hyper Pro (AWD) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 205128
TBD
SAR 197338
TBD
SAR 2761
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
215
/
4
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5042
5115
1977
1980
1780
1920
2984
/
Fuel Economy
12.7
9.3
/
110
Comfort
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✔
Wheels/brakes
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Exterior
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
254 BHP
304 BHP
350
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
