M Hero BEV vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.9
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4987
5115
2080
1980
1935
1920
2950
/
1755
/
1755
/
31
/
31
/
19.7
/
Fuel Economy
/
9.3
/
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
✓
15.6
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Nappa Leather seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
8
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
16
/
Bose
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
47 min
/
Transmission
Front, Mid, Rear
/
DHT
Automatic
✓
/
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Intelligent all-wheel-drive
/
Double arm independent suspension
/
Double arm independent suspension
/
Non-loaded body
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
275/65 R20
/
275/65 R20
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Diesel
1072 BHP
304 BHP
800
/
1400
700
/
3.3 L
Motor
Ternary lithium battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Snow, Mud, Sand, Rock, Wading
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
