CarteaCompare CarsMazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs T2 Standard

Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs T2 Standard Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and modern design
  • Outstanding financial value
  • Spacious interior space

Negative

  • Engine performance is limited
  • Suspension tuning is strict
  • Average noise insulation

Price Comparison

SAR 137450

SAR 154985

SAR 132250

SAR 149124

SAR 1850

SAR 2086

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.08 L/KM

0.09 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 9.32

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 10.49

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 65.24

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 73.4

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 279.6

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 314.55

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 3401.8

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 3827.03

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

8.3

/

Engine / Motor

210

180 km/h

4

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

5075

4785 mm

1969

2006 mm

1716

1880 mm

2930

2800 mm

407

752 L

/

5 Doors

/

220 mm

Fuel Economy

11.9

11 Km/L

74

70 L

/

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

15.6

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

226 BHP

250 BHP

420

390 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda Related Car

Jetour Related Car

Jetour Related New Car